Idaho could do more to reach Spanish speakers and ease voter ID requirements
Idaho has made some progress in expanding voter access, but advocates say challenges remain.
Susan Ripley, president of the League of Women Voters of Idaho, said same-day registration and no-excuse absentee voting, measures that typically increase voter turnout, have laid the groundwork for expanded voter access.
Overall, voter registration is up about 5% from 2016, when Idaho enacted online voter registration. It went live in 2017.
But Antonio Hernandez worries about low levels of voter turnout. “People are so focused on registering people to vote, and we see that even registered voters aren’t turning out in local elections,” said Hernandez, voting rights coordinator at Conservation Voters for Idaho.
He’s especially focused on reaching Idaho’s growing Latino population by ensuring voter information is translated into Spanish, posted online and written clearly.
Hernandez’s group led efforts to ensure such access in Lincoln County, which is mandated under the Voting Rights Act to provide ballots in Spanish. His group is also monitoring the developments in Canyon County, among the state’s most populous, where poll workers were instructed not to speak Spanish to voters in 2018. The policy was reversed days before Election Day after the Idaho Press reported on the guidelines.
Here’s a look at other barriers Idaho voters face in November:
Idaho is among the 26 states that do not have the strictest voter ID laws in the country. Voters without acceptable photo ID can cast a ballot by signing an affidavit of identity. (Unlike most states, Idaho does not use provisional ballots. Voters who sign the affidavit do not have to confirm their residence later to ensure their ballot is counted.)
Acceptable forms of ID include a driver’s license, state ID card, U.S. passport, tribal card, student ID or license to carry a concealed weapon issued by a county sheriff.
About this series
Stateline and the Center for Public Integrity are exploring how changes to polling places and other election shifts affect Americans’ ability to vote. Stateline is an initiative of The Pew Charitable Trusts. Go to vote.org for information on how to vote in 2020.
The conservative Heritage Foundation pointed to 10 cases of election fraud in Idaho between 2004 and 2017, four of which involved voting. That’s an infinitesimal percent of the more than 5.3 million ballots cast between primary and general elections over that time. Reforms to ensure election integrity do not disenfranchise voters when fraud can have an impact on close elections, the Heritage Foundation says. But Aman McLeod, a political science professor at the University of Idaho, said there’s little evidence that election fraud happens on a significant scale, and stricter ID laws are not warranted.
“In every election, there are people who break the rules,” he said. “You do what you can to catch them.”
Hernandez worries that the state’s current ID law could disenfranchise college students, who are often questioned about their residency requirements.
“If somebody is doubting you’re a resident because you’re a student, it’s hard for you to really feel comfortable declaring you’re a resident because of the situation,” Hernandez said. “If you do it wrong, there’s a fine and potentially jail time. If you do it right, I guess it’s fine. It’s a false choice. You’re basically saying, ‘To be careful, you shouldn’t vote.'”
Accessing the proper forms of photo ID is also a challenge for voters in a rural state that spans two time zones.
“You might have to drive, in some cases, 40, 50 minutes, even an hour to get to a place where you could get an ID,” McLeod said.
There’s an Idaho county, for example, that’s roughly the same size as New Jersey.
Earlier this year, Idaho conducted its primary election entirely by mail. The state encouraged voters to request their absentee ballots well in advance and built a website to ease the process.
But the website crashed just prior to the May 19 registration deadline, resulting in a federal judge ordering the state to extend it.
“It was not as easy as it could have been,” McLeod said. “Some states just sent people absentee ballots. If you were registered to vote, they sent it to you. In Idaho, you had to ask.”
Neighboring Nevada, Oregon, Utah and Washington are among the nine states and Washington, D.C., that automatically mail absentee ballots to eligible voters. Montana, meanwhile, allows its counties to do so.
McLeod also worries about disruptions in the postal service, which could lead to ballots arriving late. In Idaho, absentee ballots for the general election must be received by 8 p.m. on Nov. 3. Their processing can start seven days prior to Election Day, but the counting can’t begin until the polls close.
“I filled out my absentee ballot, and it explicitly said it could take five days,” McLeod said. “There are two different post offices in Moscow, Idaho, but even if you drop it off at one, it could take five days to get to a building that’s maybe a mile from where I am right now. Go figure.”
Despite the challenges, mail-in voting boosted turnout in the primary, which garnered 38.1% voter turnout, the highest since 1980.
Ripley expects the trend to continue in the general election. Without a statewide mask mandate, she said, some voters will choose to vote absentee rather than risk voting in person.
But Idaho Secretary of State Lawerence Denney, a Republican, sees mail-in voting as a temporary measure. Even though it led to higher voter turnout, he has said it’s unlikely the state will move entirely to a vote-by-mail system in the future.
“I think we’re pretty traditional in Idaho,” Denney told a local NBC affiliate. “A lot of people like to show up at the polls on Election Day, and I think that’s part of what we are in Idaho.”
McLeod gives credit to Idaho Republicans for expanding mail-in voting in the primary this year despite the Trump administration’s stance, which he calls “a ploy to discourage access to voting, which some people believe will favor their side in elections.”
“The [right to vote] has always been seen as a partisan issue because who gets to vote helps to determine who wins elections,” McLeod said. “If certain people can’t vote, their voices aren’t heard, elected officials don’t have to listen to them and policies aren’t changed in their favor.”
Help support this work
Public Integrity doesn’t have paywalls and doesn’t accept advertising so that our investigative reporting can have the widest possible impact on addressing inequality in the U.S. Our work is possible thanks to support from people like you.