The Sri Lankan government is vowing to impose tighter controls on pesticides and fertilizers amid growing concern the chemicals are helping fuel a mysterious epidemic of chronic kidney disease devastating its north central region.
In September, in Mystery in the Fields, the Center for Public Integrity explored how a rare form of chronic kidney disease is killing agricultural workers in Sri Lanka, India and Central America. Scientists in each region are struggling to identify the cause of these parallel epidemics, which have led to tens of thousands of deaths worldwide and are suspected to be linked to a toxic exposure.
In a November 2012 speech laying out a national budget proposal, Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa pledged to take action to crack down on contaminated agrochemicals.
“There is a theory that pesticides and chemical fertilizer contribute to increase non-communicable diseases,” Rajapaksa said, referring in oblique terms to the politically controversial kidney epidemic. “Therefore, regulations will be formulated to require suppliers and distributors of all agrochemicals to comply with quality standards.”
A committee of government ministers is meeting with scientific experts and interest groups and will submit a report to the cabinet with recommendations for the regulations, said Sri Lanka’s Registrar of Pesticides, Dr. Anura Wijesekera.
Wijesekara, whose office oversees imports and permitting of agrochemicals, said Sri Lanka had already taken a significant step earlier this year: establishing limits of detection for nine toxins including cadmium and arsenic. Pesticides and fertilizers containing more than the permitted amounts of these chemicals are prohibited from distribution.
The country has not always moved swiftly to restrict pesticides.
Following years of official research, the Sri Lankan health ministry and World Health Organization declared in June that low level exposures to the heavy metals cadmium and arsenic were “causative factors” for the ailment – which they have named CKDu, chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology. Despite prior warnings from the WHO to reduce farmers’ exposure to agrochemicals, the Sri Lankan government in 2011 lifted a temporary ban on pesticides it had found to be contaminated with small amounts of arsenic, the Center reported.
Wijesekara said he lifted the ban because the levels of arsenic contained in the pesticides were too low to pose a threat.
Now, Wijesekara said his office is acting to curb marketing by fertilizer and pesticide producers, which he said encouraged farmers to use excessive amounts of agrochemicals. “They had been trying to advertise pesticides as fast-moving consumer goods,” Wijesekara said of the pesticide industry.
Yet even as it tightens controls, the Sri Lankan government has not released the scientific reports it says provide the basis for its policies.
In June, when the WHO and Sri Lanka’s health ministry cited cadmium and arsenic exposure as a possible cause for CKDu, they did not publicly release their supporting evidence. WHO officials said a technical report detailing the lab results would be released in late September. That deadline shifted to late October, and was pushed back again as the report was submitted to the Sri Lankan health ministry for review. On December 20, Sri Lanka’s Director General of Health Services, Dr. Palitha Mahipala, told a CPI reporter he would share the technical report, but the WHO then indicated it would not be ready until mid-January.
Some experts question whether the government truly has evidence to back up its assertions. Wijesekara said he attended closed-door sessions earlier this year in which the WHO presented its scientific findings to government officials and leading researchers. He said the WHO indicated the culprit was cadmium rather than arsenic, but did not share detailed evidence linking the exposure to agrochemicals. “I don’t have any scientific evidence to accept that they cause CKDu,” Wijesekara said.
Protections for kidney recipients
As the official study remains sealed, Sri Lanka is acting to improve treatment for the flood of CKDu patients in its hard-hit northern farmlands. This fall, the government hospital in the city of Anuradhapura, the capital of Sri Lanka’s North Central Province, performed its first kidney transplants, which offer the only chance at long-term survival for patients with advanced cases of the disease.
Among the seven patients receiving transplants in Anuradhapura was 21-year-old Sampath Kumarasinghe – an ailing rice farmer the Center profiled in September. Sampath had his transplant on Sept. 25 and is recovering successfully, said Dr. Rajeewa Dassanayake, the head of the nephrology unit at the Anuradhapura hospital.
Yet his path to a new kidney came after a twist involving a potential donor.
In September, the Center reported that Sampath was expecting a kidney donation from a stranger named W. B. Ajantha, who said he was following the example set by Buddhist monks and donating his kidney for free.
Dr. Dassanayake said the hospital has since discovered that Ajantha had been offering his kidney to various patients – taking small payments and requesting lodging for his family in advance. “He pretends he’s going to give his kidney, asks for a couple of hundred rupees,” Dassanayake said of Ajantha.
Dassanayake and Sampath said Ajantha had lived with Sampath’s family and relied on them for support for weeks before the operation. Sampath ended up getting his kidney from a cadaver. A few days after the surgery, Ajantha left the area. He could not be reached for comment.
Of late, Dassanayake said, some individuals and groups have emerged seeking to exploit the epidemic. To prevent problems, Dassanayake said his hospital only accepts kidney donations from Buddhist monks and relatives of patients, and prohibits donors from selling kidneys for a fee. He said he has seen people falsely claiming to be brothers in order for one to sell their kidney to the other, and other instances in which money changed hands between family members in exchange for a kidney donation.
“When people don’t have a donor they get really frustrated and pluck at straws,” Dassanayake said. “There are various people and organizations who pretend to help people find a kidney as well, but I don’t know a single patient who has found a kidney through one of these organizations.”
Anna Barry-Jester contributed to this report.
Read more in Health
Critics question credibility of federal panel charged with investigating