Federal Politics

Published — November 23, 2011 Updated — May 19, 2014 at 12:19 pm ET

Lobbyist Loeffler now raising cash for Huntsman super PAC

Republican presidential candidate, former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman speaks during a town hall style meeting in Portsmouth, N.H. Jim Cole/AP

Former Texas congressman has left campaign to focus on Our Destiny PAC

Introduction

The super PAC behind a $1.5 million New Hampshire television ad blitz for Jon Huntsman has been quietly benefiting from the fundraising muscle of lobbyist Tom Loeffler, who until recently was a top Huntsman campaign official.

Back in September, Loeffler — a former Texas Congressman — was a senior adviser to Huntsman’s presidential campaign and briefly served as its chairman. But Loeffler told iWatch News that about two months ago he left the campaign — where donations are restricted — and shifted to raising unlimited funds for Our Destiny PAC, the super PAC that’s supporting Huntsman.

“I had to sever my ties with the campaign,” Loeffler said in reference to the presidential effort for Huntsman, the former Utah governor and ambassador to China.

Loeffler’s move is the latest sign of the apparently tight links between presidential campaigns and allied super PACs, despite laws barring “coordination” of various activities, especially advertising. Federal Election Commission rulings, though, have allowed considerable leeway on the fundraising front, campaign finance lawyers say.

Other super PACs helping candidates have also gotten financial boosts from former campaign aides who jumped ship to join the PACs. This past summer, Steve Roche — who had been a top fundraiser for the presidential campaign of Mitt Romney — departed that post to spearhead the money chase for the super PAC supporting Romney, Restore Our Future.

Campaign finance watchdogs have been raising alarms about the apparent linkages between presidential super PACs and campaigns.

“It’s another example of how these candidate-specific super PACs are really functioning as arms of the campaigns themselves,” said Fred Wertheimer, the president of Democracy 21.

Wertheimer said his group is “looking at the legality of all these presidential candidate-specific super PACs.” He said FEC rules on coordination “are very weak and there’s very little evidence that the FEC is willing to enforce even its weak rules.”

Super PACs backing presidential candidates have mushroomed in the wake of last year’s controversial Supreme Court decision, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The ruling allowed corporations, individuals and unions to write unlimited checks for ads and other campaign tools in support of or opposing particular candidates.

Loeffler’s move underscores the big bet that Huntsman allies are placing on raising large sums to help him catch or surpass top tier candidates — especially his effort to overtake Mitt Romney in the New Hampshire primary on Jan. 10.

Asked about how fundraising is going, Loeffler said, “You have to keep calling. Persistence pays.” Given that Loeffler was a major bundler for the last three GOP presidential nominees, Huntsman stands to reap substantial dividends from his shift to the super PAC.

The new super PAC ads began airing in the Granite State last week and will run through Thanksgiving. One of the ads contrasts Huntsman’s record as Utah governor with Rick Perry’s record in Texas. The ad also contrasts Huntsman’s stand on issues with Mitt Romney’s positions in an effort to portray Huntsman as a more consistent conservative.

Our Destiny could be crucial to Huntsman’s chances since recent reports say his campaign has spent virtually all of the $4.5 million it raised. News reports have indicated that Huntsman’s father, a billionaire who made his fortune in chemicals, pumped funds into the super PAC.

But the candidate today told CNN that “we don’t talk about those things, we can’t.” Huntsman said that he didn’t know where the money came from for the super PAC’s latest ad buys, but added that he was “just delighted we’ve actually got some outside assistance from wherever it comes from that believes in our cause.”

Loeffler, who recently joined the powerful law and lobbying firm of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld after a long career representing blue chip firms foreign clients, did a stint as a finance co-chairman for the presidential campaign of John McCain.

His clients at the Loeffler Group, one of his earlier firms, included Saudi Arabia, Hong Kong and the state of Hidalgo Mexico. Loeffler resigned as a volunteer from the McCain campaign in May 2008 after it established conflict-of-interest policies regarding lobbyists and foreign agents.

In early September, when the Huntsman campaign announced that Loeffler was becoming chairman, it was seen as a coup, since the lobbyist had previously been a major donor for Texas governor Rick Perry.

Romney’s super PAC, which was started first, is the only one of the GOP groups that has thus far been required to report fundraising totals and donors names to the FEC. At the end of the first half of 2011, Restore Our Future had raised just over $12 million.

Restore Our Future, which has not yet run ads, was formed by three close Romney allies who worked on his 2008 campaign. This summer Romney attended — and spoke briefly at — a New York dinner hosted by his super PAC for big donors and potential donors. The FEC has specifically barred candidates from making requests for unlimited checks, but they’re allowed to ask for donations of up to $5,000 per person.

Make Us Great Again, the presidential super PAC allied with Texas governor Rick Perry, has been running hundreds of thousands of dollars of television spots for several weeks in Iowa and South Carolina in an effort to give his lackluster candidacy a shot in the arm.

Read more in Federal Politics

Share this article

Join the conversation

Show Comments

11
Leave a Reply

avatar
9 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
1 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
SOUTH JERSEYTed SiroisMark SullivanTom LarkinAnonymous Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Mark Sullivan
Guest
Mark Sullivan

Trump needs to conduct these activities because the entire MSM media, excluding Fox, is campaigning against him 24/7/365.

Didn’t Monica’s boyfriend’s wife and various criminal enterprises outspend Trump by almost 2-1?

CapitalistRoader
Guest
CapitalistRoader

Why wouldn’t he get an early start on fund raising? Hillary outspent him two-to-one in 2016. The Dem’s are the party of big money. The President knows this and is attempting to get a jump on it. Of course the Dem candidate will outspend him in 2020 so it’s only rational that he starts fund raising now.

George Young
Guest
George Young

Oh brother. We just 8 years of the Campaigner – in – Chief. Where was this journalistic rectal thermometer then. Just another article about 2000 words too long that merely takes another slap at Trump for something he far from initiated.

j stevenson
Guest
j stevenson

The big difference between Trump and all the rest is his refusing to accept funds from lobbyists, so they don’t have the White House access they are used to. These are the donors who buy the presidency and are as pixxed off that he won the election as are the media and the Dems. Lobbyists have never been shut out of the WH and Trump has told them he is not for sale.

jan v
Guest
jan v

all the lobbyists are running all our government agencies and all the career civil servants who know how to run the country have been fired. YOU think this is a good thing ? what a crock…

thomas alessi
Guest
thomas alessi

I am for Trump

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Trump needs to be impeached and tossed in prison. Then have the key thrown away so he will never be free. Then he can see how it feels not to have freedom.

Mark Sullivan
Guest
Mark Sullivan

Thank you for the usual insightful leftist low IQ Snowflake response.

barney
Guest

hes not imprisoning them hes sending them back to their country chill tf out

SOUTH JERSEY
Guest
SOUTH JERSEY

WHY DONT YOU HAVE FREEDOM?

Tom Larkin
Guest
Tom Larkin

First, something positive. I was happy to learn of empirical information in article. BUT, the article was so slanted against President Trump as to be deemed fake news (“Perhaps Trump just lied.” (Two different issues)). The article mentions that President Trump raised over $67 million, but ended 2018 with $19 million. President Trump spent over $40 million 2016 and 2017. President Trump conducted 57 political rallies. The article notes the hats and T-shirts sold, but NEVER MENTIONS THE INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF REPUBLICAN SENATORS during a mid-term election that lost the House and the number of political rallies in… Read more »

Ted Sirois
Guest
Ted Sirois

At least Trump is getting donations from willing donors. Fresh from his first election, Obama used billions of our children’s tax dollars to save thousands of union jobs in the car industry and bailed out the banks and many Wall Street businesses. This secured his source of reelection funds for his reelection four years later.

South Jersey
Guest
South Jersey

TRUMP 2020; IS AN AMAZINGLY SMART MAN! VERY ORIGINAL & CREATIVE. I AM HAPPY TO HAVE HIS AS POTUS.

SOUTH JERSEY
Guest
SOUTH JERSEY

THIS ARTICLE WAS OBVIOUSLY WRITTEN BY, A TRUMP-HATE-GROUP. THAT FEELS; IT IS NOT NORMAL TO BE SUCCESSFUL WITH YOUR OWN BRAND NAME. WHEN, IF FACT, IT IS NORMAL! >>>>> THIS IS >>> FAKE NEWS!!! <<<< ie: A PACK-OF-LIES; SPUN INTO; DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER. FOR A SINISTER-AGENDA OF; FASCIST DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST, COUP D'ETAT

David
Guest
David

Are you on some kind of drugs? Writing in caps makes me think that you are grumpy old fart or a uneducated hillbilly.