Federal Politics

Published — April 4, 2019

Ethics watchdog won’t certify Mnuchin report, but says questions raised by his wife’s company now addressed

U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin gestures as he speaks to media upon his arrival to a hotel with his Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer in Beijing, Thursday, March 28, 2019. (AP Photo/Andy Wong)

The unusual delay in approving Mnuchin’s disclosure documents prompted questions. 

Introduction

The executive branch’s chief ethics watchdog today declined to certify Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin’s 2018 personal financial disclosure report, citing an issue raised by his wife’s film company, but said the concern has now been addressed by revisions to Mnuchin’s ethics agreement.  

The Office of Government Ethics “is unable to certify Secretary Mnuchin’s annual 2018 public financial disclosure report because he has an imputed interest in Stormchaser Partners LLC, which he agreed to divest,” Office of Government Ethics Director Emory Rounds wrote in a letter to Senate Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-IA. Mnuchin’s wife, Louise Linton, owns Stormchaser.

Rounds noted however that  Mnuchin had been following advice from ethics officials at the Treasury Department, and those ethics officials “did not inform OGE of this advice, which had the effect of letting the Secretary reacquire, without prior approval from OGE, a financial interest in an asset he agreed to divest.”

Mnuchin has modified his ethics agreement, and “OGE is satisfied” that the changes will enable him to comply with applicable conflict of interest laws, Rounds wrote.

The Treasury Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the Center for Public Integrity. Treasury spokesman Tony Sayegh on Twitter posted a statement stressing that Mnuchin’s disclosure had been certified by career ethics officials at Treasury “and he has been in compliance with his ethics obligations at all times.”

“This is simply the result of a technical difference between OGE and Treasury’s career ethics officials. OGE has identified no conflict presented by the asset held by the Secretary’s wife,” Sayegh wrote.

A copy of Mnuchin’s revised ethics agreement, dated this week, shows Mnuchin has agreed to additional recusal requirements involving Stormchaser Partners, including recusing from “particular matters of general applicability involving the film industry which could affect Stormchaser.”

A letter from Treasury Assistant General Counsel Brian J. Sonfield to OGE confirmed that before Mnuchin and Linton married in June 2017, Treasury ethics officials concluded her continued ownership of Stormchaser posed no conflict, and advised the couple she did not need to divest it. The original requirement that Mnuchin divest his stake was “out of an abundance of caution.”

In March, the Center for Public Integrity reported the holdup in certification of Mnuchin’s financial disclosure could be related to questions over Stormchaser.

Previously, in responding to questions about the unusually lengthy delay in obtaining final certification for Mnuchin’s disclosure report, Treasury spokespeople have repeatedly stressed that Treasury ethics officials certified Mnuchin’s report and the secretary has consulted with them and followed their advice.

Mnuchin first filed the report in May 2018. He was the last member of President Donald Trump’s Cabinet waiting for a verdict on his legally required disclosures.

Refusing to sign off would have been unusual, though not unprecedented. The Office of Government Ethics in February refused to certify the report of Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, finding he was “not in compliance with his ethics agreement at the time of the report.” It also refused to certify the termination report filed by former U.S. Environmental Protection Agency head Scott Pruitt, citing ethics questions related to his rental of a Capitol Hill apartment.

Ethics officials had steadfastly refused to comment publicly on the reasons holding up Mnuchin’s report.

Mnuchin’s original ethics agreement, negotiated when he joined the government, required him to step down from the chairmanship of Stormchaser Partners and divest his own ownership interest in it within 90 days of his confirmation in February 2017. (Mnuchin also agreed to divest dozens of other assets that ethics officials said potentially presented conflicts of interest or the appearance of one.)

Mnuchin reported selling his interests in Stormchaser Partners in May 2017 for a total between $1 million and $2 million; values are reported in ranges. He and Linton weren’t married at the time, so her assets weren’t public, but Treasury has since confirmed she bought his interest.

The couple married in June 2017. As required, Mnuchin publicly disclosed Linton’s assets on the disclosure form he filed last year. Under ethics law, Linton owning the company is the same as Mnuchin owning it himself.

That means the divestment of Mnuchin’s ownership stake didn’t cure any conflicts as long as Linton owns it.

In addition, the Center for Public Integrity reported Stormchaser Partners itself owes Mnuchin between $1 million and $2 million, an amount equal to what he reported selling his stake in the company for back in May 2017.

Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, the ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, said he is “concerned” by OGE’s decision not to certify Mnuchin’s report.

“Before being confirmed by the Senate, he signed an ethics agreement that said he would divest from Stormchaser Partners LLC. Rather than divest, he violated the spirit of his ethics agreement by selling his interest to his then-fiancee and then he violated the letter of the agreement when he reacquired the assets upon their marriage,” Wyden said. “Secretary Mnuchin has filed a new ethics agreement that concludes his interest in Stormchaser is above board. I’m baffled by the Office of Government Ethics’ and Treasury’s handling of this matter, and I plan to thoroughly review this matter and the details of Secretary Mnuchin’s modified ethics agreement.”

Read more in Federal Politics

Share this article

Join the conversation

Show Comments

11
Leave a Reply

avatar
9 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
1 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
SOUTH JERSEYTed SiroisMark SullivanTom LarkinAnonymous Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Mark Sullivan
Guest
Mark Sullivan

Trump needs to conduct these activities because the entire MSM media, excluding Fox, is campaigning against him 24/7/365.

Didn’t Monica’s boyfriend’s wife and various criminal enterprises outspend Trump by almost 2-1?

CapitalistRoader
Guest
CapitalistRoader

Why wouldn’t he get an early start on fund raising? Hillary outspent him two-to-one in 2016. The Dem’s are the party of big money. The President knows this and is attempting to get a jump on it. Of course the Dem candidate will outspend him in 2020 so it’s only rational that he starts fund raising now.

George Young
Guest
George Young

Oh brother. We just 8 years of the Campaigner – in – Chief. Where was this journalistic rectal thermometer then. Just another article about 2000 words too long that merely takes another slap at Trump for something he far from initiated.

j stevenson
Guest
j stevenson

The big difference between Trump and all the rest is his refusing to accept funds from lobbyists, so they don’t have the White House access they are used to. These are the donors who buy the presidency and are as pixxed off that he won the election as are the media and the Dems. Lobbyists have never been shut out of the WH and Trump has told them he is not for sale.

jan v
Guest
jan v

all the lobbyists are running all our government agencies and all the career civil servants who know how to run the country have been fired. YOU think this is a good thing ? what a crock…

thomas alessi
Guest
thomas alessi

I am for Trump

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Trump needs to be impeached and tossed in prison. Then have the key thrown away so he will never be free. Then he can see how it feels not to have freedom.

Mark Sullivan
Guest
Mark Sullivan

Thank you for the usual insightful leftist low IQ Snowflake response.

barney
Guest

hes not imprisoning them hes sending them back to their country chill tf out

SOUTH JERSEY
Guest
SOUTH JERSEY

WHY DONT YOU HAVE FREEDOM?

Tom Larkin
Guest
Tom Larkin

First, something positive. I was happy to learn of empirical information in article. BUT, the article was so slanted against President Trump as to be deemed fake news (“Perhaps Trump just lied.” (Two different issues)). The article mentions that President Trump raised over $67 million, but ended 2018 with $19 million. President Trump spent over $40 million 2016 and 2017. President Trump conducted 57 political rallies. The article notes the hats and T-shirts sold, but NEVER MENTIONS THE INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF REPUBLICAN SENATORS during a mid-term election that lost the House and the number of political rallies in… Read more »

Ted Sirois
Guest
Ted Sirois

At least Trump is getting donations from willing donors. Fresh from his first election, Obama used billions of our children’s tax dollars to save thousands of union jobs in the car industry and bailed out the banks and many Wall Street businesses. This secured his source of reelection funds for his reelection four years later.

South Jersey
Guest
South Jersey

TRUMP 2020; IS AN AMAZINGLY SMART MAN! VERY ORIGINAL & CREATIVE. I AM HAPPY TO HAVE HIS AS POTUS.

SOUTH JERSEY
Guest
SOUTH JERSEY

THIS ARTICLE WAS OBVIOUSLY WRITTEN BY, A TRUMP-HATE-GROUP. THAT FEELS; IT IS NOT NORMAL TO BE SUCCESSFUL WITH YOUR OWN BRAND NAME. WHEN, IF FACT, IT IS NORMAL! >>>>> THIS IS >>> FAKE NEWS!!! <<<< ie: A PACK-OF-LIES; SPUN INTO; DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER. FOR A SINISTER-AGENDA OF; FASCIST DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST, COUP D'ETAT

David
Guest
David

Are you on some kind of drugs? Writing in caps makes me think that you are grumpy old fart or a uneducated hillbilly.