Federal Politics

Published — September 7, 2010 Updated — May 19, 2014 at 12:19 pm ET

Despite court win after Citizens United, SpeechNow.Org yet to capitalize

Introduction

Last week, a Houston-based group called Texas Tea Party Patriots PAC, alerted the Federal Election Commission that it intends to raise unlimited sums of money, without following any contribution size limits.

The notification wasn’t just a courtesy, however. These tea-partying Texans and 22 other committees are lining up to take advantage of a new opening in campaign finance law.

But one organization that has not yet notified the FEC is SpeechNow.org, the group that successfully raised a legal challenge to previous contribution limitations on independent expenditure committees.

In 2007, SpeechNow.org, which calls itself an “independent speech organization,” asked the FEC for an advisory opinion on whether its organizers could pool their funds into one bank account to run expenditure advertisements for and against political candidates. The FEC, in an early 2008 response, advised the group that such activity would fall under the definition of a political committee and would require them to abide by the same contribution limits as groups giving money directly to candidates — a maximum of $5,000 per donor, annually.

SpeechNow.org sued the FEC and, in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling, prevailed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. In a March 2010 ruling, that court said SpeechNow.org could raise unlimited sums of money, so long as it did not contribute directly to or coordinate its activities with any political candidates or party committees.

Following its judicial defeat, the FEC issued a new advisory opinion on July 22 acknowledging that a political committee could indeed “raise funds in unlimited amounts” so long as none of that money is used for direct contributions of any kind to federal candidates or committees, and provided that the committee file a letter with the agency saying that it plans to take advantage of this new option.

The groups that have so far notified the FEC include two committees affiliated with large environmental groups, one tied to Planned Parenthood of California, and one linked to the Club for Growth, a political group famous for supporting fiscally conservative candidates in both general elections and in Republican primaries. Also on the list: the Karl Rove-backed American Crossroads, expected to be a major player in the mid-term elections this fall, and a group connected to the American Dental Association, which represents more than 150,000 dental professionals and students.

During its legal battle, SpeechNow.org told the courts that it planned to fund raise and make independent expenditures in the 2010 election cycle, assuming it won the right to bypass fundraising limits. But more than five months since its court victory, the group has yet to register any form of committee with the FEC.

David Keating, a founder of SpeechNow.org and the executive director of Club for Growth, told the Center for Public Integrity that SpeechNow.org does indeed plan to register and be active in this year’s elections. “We’re gonna be on the list soon. We have to get money and do the filing.” He noted that his group has yet to raise any cash and still needs to establish a bank account. But, Keating said, SpeechNow.org “definitely will” be up and running and active before the November mid-term election.

Another First Amendment activist who helped found SpeechNow.org is Edward Crane, president of the libertarian Cato Institute.

The following is a list of groups that have notified the FEC so far:

  • American Crossroads (Washington, D.C.)
  • American Dental Association PAC Independent Expenditures Committee (Washington, D.C.)
  • Americans for New Leadership (Las Vegas, Nev.)
  • America’s Families First Action Fund (Washington, D.C.)
  • Arizonans Working Together (Scottsdale, Ariz.)
  • Californians for Fiscally Conservative Leadership (Coarsegold, Calif.)
  • Citizens for Strength and Security PAC (Washington, D.C.)
  • Club for Growth Action (Washington, D.C.)
  • Commonsense Ten (Washington, D.C.)
  • Communications Workers of America Working Voices (Washington, D.C.)
  • Concerned Taxpayers of America (Washington, D.C.)
  • Conservatives for Truth (Jackson, Tenn,)
  • First Amendment Alliance (Alexandria, Va.)
  • Florida Is Not For Sale (Coral Gables, Fla.)
  • Headquarters Committee of West Hollywood/Beverly Hills & Stonewall Democratic Clubs & Stonewall Young Democrats, Ltd. (Burbank, Calif.)
  • League of Conservation Voters Victory Fund (Washington, D.C.)
  • Louisiana Truth PAC (New Orleans, La.)
  • Majority Action PAC (Washington, D.C.)
  • New Prosperity Foundation (Chicago, Ill.)
  • People’s Majority (Alexandria, Va.)
  • Protecting Choice In California 2010, a project of Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California (Sacramento, Calif.)
  • Sierra Club Independent Action (San Francisco, Calif.)
  • Texas Tea Party Patriots PAC (The Woodlands, Texas)

Read more in Federal Politics

Share this article

Join the conversation

Show Comments

11
Leave a Reply

avatar
9 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
1 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
SOUTH JERSEYTed SiroisMark SullivanTom LarkinAnonymous Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Mark Sullivan
Guest
Mark Sullivan

Trump needs to conduct these activities because the entire MSM media, excluding Fox, is campaigning against him 24/7/365.

Didn’t Monica’s boyfriend’s wife and various criminal enterprises outspend Trump by almost 2-1?

CapitalistRoader
Guest
CapitalistRoader

Why wouldn’t he get an early start on fund raising? Hillary outspent him two-to-one in 2016. The Dem’s are the party of big money. The President knows this and is attempting to get a jump on it. Of course the Dem candidate will outspend him in 2020 so it’s only rational that he starts fund raising now.

George Young
Guest
George Young

Oh brother. We just 8 years of the Campaigner – in – Chief. Where was this journalistic rectal thermometer then. Just another article about 2000 words too long that merely takes another slap at Trump for something he far from initiated.

j stevenson
Guest
j stevenson

The big difference between Trump and all the rest is his refusing to accept funds from lobbyists, so they don’t have the White House access they are used to. These are the donors who buy the presidency and are as pixxed off that he won the election as are the media and the Dems. Lobbyists have never been shut out of the WH and Trump has told them he is not for sale.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Trump needs to be impeached and tossed in prison. Then have the key thrown away so he will never be free. Then he can see how it feels not to have freedom.

Mark Sullivan
Guest
Mark Sullivan

Thank you for the usual insightful leftist low IQ Snowflake response.

barney
Guest

hes not imprisoning them hes sending them back to their country chill tf out

SOUTH JERSEY
Guest
SOUTH JERSEY

WHY DONT YOU HAVE FREEDOM?

Tom Larkin
Guest
Tom Larkin

First, something positive. I was happy to learn of empirical information in article. BUT, the article was so slanted against President Trump as to be deemed fake news (“Perhaps Trump just lied.” (Two different issues)). The article mentions that President Trump raised over $67 million, but ended 2018 with $19 million. President Trump spent over $40 million 2016 and 2017. President Trump conducted 57 political rallies. The article notes the hats and T-shirts sold, but NEVER MENTIONS THE INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF REPUBLICAN SENATORS during a mid-term election that lost the House and the number of political rallies in… Read more »

Ted Sirois
Guest
Ted Sirois

At least Trump is getting donations from willing donors. Fresh from his first election, Obama used billions of our children’s tax dollars to save thousands of union jobs in the car industry and bailed out the banks and many Wall Street businesses. This secured his source of reelection funds for his reelection four years later.

South Jersey
Guest
South Jersey

TRUMP 2020; IS AN AMAZINGLY SMART MAN! VERY ORIGINAL & CREATIVE. I AM HAPPY TO HAVE HIS AS POTUS.

SOUTH JERSEY
Guest
SOUTH JERSEY

THIS ARTICLE WAS OBVIOUSLY WRITTEN BY, A TRUMP-HATE-GROUP. THAT FEELS; IT IS NOT NORMAL TO BE SUCCESSFUL WITH YOUR OWN BRAND NAME. WHEN, IF FACT, IT IS NORMAL! >>>>> THIS IS >>> FAKE NEWS!!! <<<< ie: A PACK-OF-LIES; SPUN INTO; DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER. FOR A SINISTER-AGENDA OF; FASCIST DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST, COUP D'ETAT

David
Guest
David

Are you on some kind of drugs? Writing in caps makes me think that you are grumpy old fart or a uneducated hillbilly.