<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Center for Public Integrity</provider_name><provider_url>https://publicintegrity.org</provider_url><author_name>admin</author_name><author_url>https://publicintegrity.org/author/admin/</author_url><title>High-profile charities distance themselves from telemarketer following federal allegations</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="zR6acAKvaH"&gt;&lt;a href="https://publicintegrity.org/politics/high-profile-charities-distance-themselves-from-telemarketer-following-federal-allegations/"&gt;High-profile charities distance themselves from telemarketer following federal allegations&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://publicintegrity.org/politics/high-profile-charities-distance-themselves-from-telemarketer-following-federal-allegations/embed/#?secret=zR6acAKvaH" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;High-profile charities distance themselves from telemarketer following federal allegations&#x201D; &#x2014; Center for Public Integrity" data-secret="zR6acAKvaH" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://i0.wp.com/publicintegrity.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/infocisionstadium.jpg?fit=1260%2C850&amp;ssl=1</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1260</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>850</thumbnail_height><description>At least one high-profile charity has cut ties with politically connected telemarketer InfoCision &#x2014; and three others are considering a split &#x2014; after the Federal Trade Commission earlier this month accused the company of lying to potential donors. Other nonprofits are distancing themselves from InfoCision, while some are standing by the firm, Center for Public [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
