Immigration Decoded

Published — January 30, 2018 Updated — April 27, 2018 at 3:19 pm ET

Honduran boy who lost asylum bid wasn’t entitled to government-appointed counsel, court rules

Appeals court panel ruling is latest setback for endangered kids detailed in Center story.

Introduction

A 9th Circuit Court of Appeals three-judge panel ruled Monday that a 13-year-old Honduran boy was not entitled to the appointment of counsel during an unsuccessful asylum bid.

The boy was initially represented by his mother.

The ruling did not cast doubt on the boy’s argument that gang members held a gun to his head and threatened him if he didn’t join a so-called Mara gang.

“Absent a reprieve offered by the government, C.J. will likely be returned to a country in turmoil,” the ruling said, but immigration law “neither provides for nor implies a right to court-appointed counsel at government expense.”

One judge on the San Francisco-based appeals court panel opined that the narrow ruling did not apply to minors who arrive in the United States on their own rather than with a parent, as the Honduran boy did.

Read our story about how volunteer lawyers pieced together vital defense arguments and evidence for minors’ asylum cases:

A life-and-death struggle for asylum in America


Read more in Immigration

Share this article

Join the conversation

Show Comments

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of