Federal Politics

Published — August 2, 2013 Updated — May 13, 2014 at 2:50 pm ET

The slow deaths of presidential super PACs

Once mighty and moneyed, these political committees are bleeding cash and fading from view

Introduction

Like massive pop-up stores that disappear once Halloween is over, several presidential contender-specific super PACs that played crucial roles through Election Day 2012 have all but vanished from national politics.

With President Barack Obama re-elected and Republican challenger Mitt Romney vanquished, groups such as conservative Restore Our Future and liberal Priorities USA Action could have easily enshrined themselves in the political firmament by supporting 2014 midterm hopefuls or pressing issues such as guns or immigration.

Instead, today they appear to have neither candidate nor cause, to be remembered only as one-hit wonders that — in stark contrast to party committees and candidate campaign machines — blink out of existence just as quickly as they once bolted to the forefront of post-Citizens United electioneering.

None have much money left. Their once mighty war chests, filled with hundreds of millions of dollars by the mega-donor likes of Republican casino magnate Sheldon Adelson and Democratic media mogul Fred Eychaner, have in some cases dwindled into the four- and five-figure range, according to financial documents filed Wednesday with the Federal Election Commission.

And the little income these and other presidential-focused super PACs realized in 2013 isn’t coming from flesh-and-blood donors, but instead as a result of credits or transfers from associated committees.

What money they’re spending this year isn’t going toward advertising buys or online ad campaigns, but paying for the most perfunctory of expenses, such as legal and consulting fees.

Restore Our Future, which raised $153.7 million during the 2012 election cycle — the most among super PACs — had little more than $1 million cash on hand through June 30, its disclosures indicate.

The parade of wealthy conservatives so eager just months ago to bankroll the super PAC don’t account for the super PAC’s $700,000 in receipts between Jan. 1 and June 30 come. Rather, the money is derived from media buy refunds off purchases made with a consulting firm in Towson, Md.

Restore Our Future’s co-founder, Charlie Spies, has lately been focusing his efforts on other super PACs with which he’s involved.

Priorities USA Action, meanwhile, ended June with about $3.4 million in reserve after raising $79 million during the 2012 cycle — third-most among super PACs.

A media buy refund from last year also accounted for most of its $356,000 in 2013 income. The rest came in the form of a cash transfer from a joint fundraising committee with which it worked.

Rather than spending its remaining money on political candidates, Priorities USA Action gave much of it away this year: $250,000 to Democrat-focused super PAC Senate Majority PAC and $100,000 to help fund state-level efforts of EMILY’s List.

Officials at both Restore Our Future and Priorities USA Action did not respond to messages seeking comment.

That’s not necessarily a surprise for Priorities USA Action, as several of its top staffers — co-founder Bill Burton, spokeswoman Marcy Stech and Compliance and Operations Director Megan Brengarth included — have left the organization in recent months for other jobs.

Its website hasn’t been updated in months. “We are at the forefront of efforts to draw clear contrasts between progressive policies and those of the far right,” reads a statement posted there.

Restore Our Future’s website isn’t any better, offering few details of its future and cryptically stating: “The fight to protect America from the growing debt, higher taxes and attacks on our job creators is not over.”

The super PACs could yet bounce back. Since they may accept unlimited donations, it only takes a single millionaire or billionaire to regain relevance.

But many prominent donors have taken their cash elsewhere in 2013, filling the accounts of super PACs that tout specific policy goals or broader electoral agendas, such as helping Democrats or Republicans win the U.S. House or U.S. Senate. Or they’re bankrolling new candidate-specific super PACs that are backing the likes of Democrat Hillary Clinton and U.S. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

Like Priorities USA Action and Restore Our Future, the formerly pro-Newt Gingrich super PAC Winning Our Future has become peripheral despite its brief attempts to reinvent itself.

Through June, Winning Our Future reported just $4,486 in available cash, federal records show. During the 2012 election cycle, it had raised almost $24 million.

The formerly pro-Rick Santorum Red White and Blue Fund super PAC hasn’t raised a cent during 2013 after collecting millions of dollars from GOP benefactor Foster Friess and others.

It sat atop $95,200 as of June 30, according to federal filings, its meager spending this year going toward consulting fees, database services and a couple of plane tickets.

Endorse Liberty, which supported Republican Ron Paul and was funded primarily by PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel, only had $13,637 left to its name through June.

After compiling $4 million ahead of the 2012 election, it has failed to raise any money this year despite predictions it would emerge as a force supporting congressional candidates who “uphold the principles of liberty.”

While Endorse Liberty, too, appears destined for the super PAC scrap heap, its latest treasurer says no.

“The PAC has been quietly laying the groundwork to kick off a significant effort in the second half of this year,” said Dan Backer, an Alexandria, Va.-based election lawyer who didn’t detail what the effort would entail.

Read more in Federal Politics

Share this article

Join the conversation

Show Comments

11
Leave a Reply

avatar
9 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
1 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
SOUTH JERSEYTed SiroisMark SullivanTom LarkinAnonymous Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Mark Sullivan
Guest
Mark Sullivan

Trump needs to conduct these activities because the entire MSM media, excluding Fox, is campaigning against him 24/7/365.

Didn’t Monica’s boyfriend’s wife and various criminal enterprises outspend Trump by almost 2-1?

CapitalistRoader
Guest
CapitalistRoader

Why wouldn’t he get an early start on fund raising? Hillary outspent him two-to-one in 2016. The Dem’s are the party of big money. The President knows this and is attempting to get a jump on it. Of course the Dem candidate will outspend him in 2020 so it’s only rational that he starts fund raising now.

George Young
Guest
George Young

Oh brother. We just 8 years of the Campaigner – in – Chief. Where was this journalistic rectal thermometer then. Just another article about 2000 words too long that merely takes another slap at Trump for something he far from initiated.

j stevenson
Guest
j stevenson

The big difference between Trump and all the rest is his refusing to accept funds from lobbyists, so they don’t have the White House access they are used to. These are the donors who buy the presidency and are as pixxed off that he won the election as are the media and the Dems. Lobbyists have never been shut out of the WH and Trump has told them he is not for sale.

jan v
Guest
jan v

all the lobbyists are running all our government agencies and all the career civil servants who know how to run the country have been fired. YOU think this is a good thing ? what a crock…

thomas alessi
Guest
thomas alessi

I am for Trump

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Trump needs to be impeached and tossed in prison. Then have the key thrown away so he will never be free. Then he can see how it feels not to have freedom.

Mark Sullivan
Guest
Mark Sullivan

Thank you for the usual insightful leftist low IQ Snowflake response.

barney
Guest

hes not imprisoning them hes sending them back to their country chill tf out

SOUTH JERSEY
Guest
SOUTH JERSEY

WHY DONT YOU HAVE FREEDOM?

Tom Larkin
Guest
Tom Larkin

First, something positive. I was happy to learn of empirical information in article. BUT, the article was so slanted against President Trump as to be deemed fake news (“Perhaps Trump just lied.” (Two different issues)). The article mentions that President Trump raised over $67 million, but ended 2018 with $19 million. President Trump spent over $40 million 2016 and 2017. President Trump conducted 57 political rallies. The article notes the hats and T-shirts sold, but NEVER MENTIONS THE INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF REPUBLICAN SENATORS during a mid-term election that lost the House and the number of political rallies in… Read more »

Ted Sirois
Guest
Ted Sirois

At least Trump is getting donations from willing donors. Fresh from his first election, Obama used billions of our children’s tax dollars to save thousands of union jobs in the car industry and bailed out the banks and many Wall Street businesses. This secured his source of reelection funds for his reelection four years later.

South Jersey
Guest
South Jersey

TRUMP 2020; IS AN AMAZINGLY SMART MAN! VERY ORIGINAL & CREATIVE. I AM HAPPY TO HAVE HIS AS POTUS.

SOUTH JERSEY
Guest
SOUTH JERSEY

THIS ARTICLE WAS OBVIOUSLY WRITTEN BY, A TRUMP-HATE-GROUP. THAT FEELS; IT IS NOT NORMAL TO BE SUCCESSFUL WITH YOUR OWN BRAND NAME. WHEN, IF FACT, IT IS NORMAL! >>>>> THIS IS >>> FAKE NEWS!!! <<<< ie: A PACK-OF-LIES; SPUN INTO; DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER. FOR A SINISTER-AGENDA OF; FASCIST DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST, COUP D'ETAT

David
Guest
David

Are you on some kind of drugs? Writing in caps makes me think that you are grumpy old fart or a uneducated hillbilly.