Federal Politics

Published — June 28, 2012 Updated — May 19, 2014 at 12:19 pm ET

Local leaders sue for right to control location of gas wells

Workers stand near a rig that drills into the shale at a well site in Washington, Pa. Keith Srakocic/AP file

Natural gas contributions, lobbying dollars flow

Introduction

When Pennsylvania passed a state law that stripped local authority over where potentially hazardous natural gas wells could be drilled, cities and townships decided to take matters into their own hands.

Seven municipalities from across the state have filed a lawsuit in Pennsylvania’s Commonwealth Court challenging the constitutionality of Act 13, a law passed in February that charges an impact fee for natural gas wells but also overrides local governments’ zoning authority. The case was argued on June 6 and is currently under review.

At first glance, the impact fee of up to $50,000 per well seems to put wealth from drilling on the Marcellus Shale into citizens’ hands. Detractors of Act 13 say, however, that it is a Trojan Horse of unwelcome stipulations.

Thanks to the law, doctors can find out what chemicals are used in fracking, the controversial drilling technique that environmentalists say turns their water taps into flamethrowers and poisons the air. But they are bound by a confidentiality clause that prevents them from telling their patients what those chemicals are. Local counties get the impact fee, but it comes with strict regulations on how it can be spent. They can use it to provide low-income housing for gas workers, for example, but not to conduct air quality testing.

Most importantly, municipal zoning jurisdiction has been overruled. Now gas companies can drill wherever they like, even if local councils vote to keep the wells out of their jurisdictions.

“It gives industry the right to tell us how we’re going to plan our townships rather than the other way around,” said David M. Ball, a petitioner in the lawsuit and councilman of Peters Township, Washington County.

Sen. Tim Solobay, D-Canonsburg, oversees three of the seven municipalities that filed the Act 13 lawsuit. Local activists and council members began campaigning against the act back when it was still House Bill 1950. They made phone calls, sent letters, protested and met with legislators in Harrisburg, but to no avail.

“The gas industry is very strong,” said Jan Milburn, president of the Westmoreland Marcellus Citizens Group. “It’s all about money. It’s not really about what constituents want.”

Solobay said he’s raised “well over $2 million to $3 million of campaign contributions” in the last 15 years and energy companies make up less than 5 percent of the total. “So I can’t imagine where people would think they’re a major influence on decisions I make,” he said.

But natural gas drilling has only become prominent in Pennsylvania in the past few years, since the development of fracking suddenly made the Marcellus Shale a lucrative resource.

According to the National Institute on Money in State Politics, Solobay raised just $500 from the oil and gas industry in his 2008 campaign. In the 2010 election, the total jumped to $16,750. The following year, he voted in favor of Act 13.

Sen. John Pippy, a Republican who also represents several of the petitioning townships in Washington and Allegheny County, received $700 from oil and gas companies in 2008. In 2010, that amount jumped to $3,650 despite the fact he was not up for re-election that year. He voted in favor of Act 13.

Rep. Jesse White, a Democrat, serves several of the same areas as Solobay, including Mount Pleasant Township, one of the petitioners in the lawsuit and home of the first Marcellus Shale drill site in Pennsylvania. White is a former supervisor of Cecil Township, another petitioner that plays host to heavy natural gas activity. He opposes Act 13 because of its disregard for local accountability.

“By taking away all the zoning regulations, the municipality — and in extension, the people — don’t even know where all this stuff is,” White said. “It’s a very bad thing in terms of transparency.”

So far this year, the oil and gas industry has contributed $250 to White’s campaign and $5,250 to Solobay’s, according to the National Institute on Money in State Politics.

Supporters of Act 13 say it promotes industrial development, bringing jobs and economic opportunity to Pennsylvania. The Marcellus Shale Coalition, an industry trade group, says the legislation will provide the industry “greater certainty to operate across Pennsylvania” while incorporating a “broad-based group of interests across industry, government, and the conservation community.”

Ball said Republican Gov. Tom Corbett, a favorite of the oil and gas industry, had been “very adamantly behind pushing this bill. They put a lot of pressure on Republican legislators to go with the game plan.”

But Solobay is a Democrat. According to Ball, however, his headquarters sits “right in the middle of the drilling area.” Range Resources, Chesapeake Energy, and EQT Corp. have all given to his campaigns, according to the Pennsylvania Department of State.

Solobay said that energy companies wouldn’t “come in and put a six-, seven- or eight-acre development right beside a school or residential area” because of potential bad PR.

“They just want to do business. They don’t want to cause headaches, grief and aggravation,” he said, “I think they’ll work with communities, even those that may have had stricter policies than what ended up in Act 13.”

In 2010, the oil and gas industry contributed $499,025 to Pennsylvania’s Senate and House candidates. In 2012, state records report $175,615 in contributions so far.

Brian Coppola, one of the lead petitioners trying to overturn the law, acting both individually and as supervisor of Robinson Township, said the industry spent millions of dollars to get Act 13 passed.

“I heard that in court from the industry attorney. It’s their act,” Coppola said.

The Marcellus Shale Coalition spent $978,766 on lobbying from January through March this year, according to state records. Other top lobbying spenders included gas drillers Range Resources at $133,766, Chesapeake Appalachia LLC at $111,099, Shell Oil at $102,400, and Spectra Energy Transmission at $48,088.

Many of the municipalities are open to natural gas drilling, they just want local authority over where the industry operates.

“The entire board of supervisors is conservative Republicans, and we’re pro-drilling,” Coppola said. “But we’re mindful of the fact that we need to do it right.”

Ball said Peters Township councilmen had spent two years developing a mineral extraction ordinance, holding public hearings on multiple drafts in a “long and involved process.” They researched what was involved in the drilling, what to be aware of and how to create a policy that was satisfactory to all parties. Finally, they issued an ordinance that they felt “protected the township to the maximum extent.”

“The people that own gas rights were able to take advantage of their property as well,” Ball said. “It was a very good ordinance, the best we could probably do.”

Act 13 would override all the townships’ efforts.

Opponents of the impact fee also fear that this violation of home rule could easily extend to other industries.

“What happens when the next industry comes down the line, like the homebuilders’ industry?” Ball asked. “Pretty soon, what does zoning even mean?”

Coppola said he receives “hundreds and hundreds of letters” every day from townships and boroughs in support of the lawsuit.

Last month, the Pennsylvania State Association of Township Supervisors, which represents 1,455 townships comprising 95 percent of Pennsylvania’s land area, passed two resolutions stating opposition to “any legislation that would remove, reduce or inhibit local government authority” or “pre-empt the existing authority of townships to regulate land use.”

“I’ve personally not heard of one municipality that has said they support the zoning provisions of Act 13,” Ball said.

Whether the Commonwealth Court affirms Act 13 or not, White, Coppola, Milburn and Ball agree that the law will most likely be appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

“Act 13 eventually is going to be undone,” Coppola said. “It strips away too many rights of individuals. People are just going to go crazy.”

Read more in Federal Politics

Share this article

Join the conversation

Show Comments

11
Leave a Reply

avatar
9 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
1 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
SOUTH JERSEYTed SiroisMark SullivanTom LarkinAnonymous Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Mark Sullivan
Guest
Mark Sullivan

Trump needs to conduct these activities because the entire MSM media, excluding Fox, is campaigning against him 24/7/365.

Didn’t Monica’s boyfriend’s wife and various criminal enterprises outspend Trump by almost 2-1?

CapitalistRoader
Guest
CapitalistRoader

Why wouldn’t he get an early start on fund raising? Hillary outspent him two-to-one in 2016. The Dem’s are the party of big money. The President knows this and is attempting to get a jump on it. Of course the Dem candidate will outspend him in 2020 so it’s only rational that he starts fund raising now.

George Young
Guest
George Young

Oh brother. We just 8 years of the Campaigner – in – Chief. Where was this journalistic rectal thermometer then. Just another article about 2000 words too long that merely takes another slap at Trump for something he far from initiated.

j stevenson
Guest
j stevenson

The big difference between Trump and all the rest is his refusing to accept funds from lobbyists, so they don’t have the White House access they are used to. These are the donors who buy the presidency and are as pixxed off that he won the election as are the media and the Dems. Lobbyists have never been shut out of the WH and Trump has told them he is not for sale.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Trump needs to be impeached and tossed in prison. Then have the key thrown away so he will never be free. Then he can see how it feels not to have freedom.

Mark Sullivan
Guest
Mark Sullivan

Thank you for the usual insightful leftist low IQ Snowflake response.

barney
Guest

hes not imprisoning them hes sending them back to their country chill tf out

SOUTH JERSEY
Guest
SOUTH JERSEY

WHY DONT YOU HAVE FREEDOM?

Tom Larkin
Guest
Tom Larkin

First, something positive. I was happy to learn of empirical information in article. BUT, the article was so slanted against President Trump as to be deemed fake news (“Perhaps Trump just lied.” (Two different issues)). The article mentions that President Trump raised over $67 million, but ended 2018 with $19 million. President Trump spent over $40 million 2016 and 2017. President Trump conducted 57 political rallies. The article notes the hats and T-shirts sold, but NEVER MENTIONS THE INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF REPUBLICAN SENATORS during a mid-term election that lost the House and the number of political rallies in… Read more »

Ted Sirois
Guest
Ted Sirois

At least Trump is getting donations from willing donors. Fresh from his first election, Obama used billions of our children’s tax dollars to save thousands of union jobs in the car industry and bailed out the banks and many Wall Street businesses. This secured his source of reelection funds for his reelection four years later.

South Jersey
Guest
South Jersey

TRUMP 2020; IS AN AMAZINGLY SMART MAN! VERY ORIGINAL & CREATIVE. I AM HAPPY TO HAVE HIS AS POTUS.

SOUTH JERSEY
Guest
SOUTH JERSEY

THIS ARTICLE WAS OBVIOUSLY WRITTEN BY, A TRUMP-HATE-GROUP. THAT FEELS; IT IS NOT NORMAL TO BE SUCCESSFUL WITH YOUR OWN BRAND NAME. WHEN, IF FACT, IT IS NORMAL! >>>>> THIS IS >>> FAKE NEWS!!! <<<< ie: A PACK-OF-LIES; SPUN INTO; DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER. FOR A SINISTER-AGENDA OF; FASCIST DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST, COUP D'ETAT

David
Guest
David

Are you on some kind of drugs? Writing in caps makes me think that you are grumpy old fart or a uneducated hillbilly.