Federal Politics

Published — July 31, 2012 Updated — May 19, 2014 at 12:19 pm ET

Daily Disclosure: Sierra Club pushes wind industry tax credit

Congressmen targeted by the Sierra Club

Introduction

The Sierra Club’s nonprofit has released three new ads yesterday targeting Republican congressmen who have opposed renewing a tax credit for the wind energy industry.

The Sierra Club so far has taken aim at six Republicans in its pro-wind campaign: Reps. Bob Latta of Ohio, Blake Farenthold of Texas, Bill Shuster of Pennsylvania, Lou Barletta of Pennsylvania, Frank Guinta of New Hampshire and Joe Heck of Nevada.

The TV and radio ads are all variations of the same template, calling on the congressmen to “save wind industry jobs” by voting to renew the wind production tax credit. The production tax credit gives owners of renewable energy projects an income tax reduction based on how much electrical output their projects create.

The American Wind Energy Association estimates there are currently 75,000 jobs in the wind industry, 37,000 of which would be at risk if the tax credit expires.

Its renewal has become a hot issue in some states, especially Iowa, thanks to the high number of wind industry jobs in the state. Presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney has come out against renewing the production tax credit whereas President Barack Obama has said he supports it.

The value of wind energy has been subjected to attacks this year by conservative groups including Americans for Prosperity and the American Legislative Exchange Council, an organization of state representatives and corporations that has drafted model bills to overturn state laws supporting wind energy.

Both groups are partially funded by the conservative billionaire Koch brothers.

In a confidential memo obtained by The Guardian, a proposal from the ultra-conservative American Tradition Institute, which also has ties to the Koch brothers, proposed a national public relations campaign aimed at discrediting the wind industry’s message.

The group publicly disavowed the proposed campaign, which, according the memo, would include a counterintelligence branch and front businesses to buy ads.

It is unclear how much the Sierra Club has spent on its “Wind Works” ad campaign, which began July 12. Because the ads do not say to “vote for” or “vote against” the congressmen mentioned, they are considered “issue ads” and therefore not reportable to the Federal Election Commission.

The Sierra Club’s super PAC, Sierra Club Independent Action, had $16,000 on hand through the end of June, its most recent FEC report shows. All of its donations in 2012 have come in small amounts, almost all between $250 and $1,500.

The super PAC has also reported spending in favor of Rep. Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., who is facing former U.S. Rep. Heather Wilson, a Republican, in the U.S. Senate election in New Mexico.

The race has attracted more than $2.3 million in outside spending, with environmental groups such as the Sierra Club and the League of Conservation Voters battling conservative behemoths American Crossroads and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which support Wilson.

Tulsi Gabbard, a Democratic candidate for U.S. House in Hawaii, has also benefitted from Sierra Club Independent Action’s spending. The group has spent $58,000 on direct mail and staff support in favor of the former Hawaii state representative.

In other outside spending news:

  • Restore Our Future, a pro-Romney super PAC, released “Olympics” on July 30. The ad extolls Romney’s role as head of the Salt Lake City Olympic Committee in 2002, as the Center reported Monday. The ad features Olympians such as figure skater Kristi Yamaguchi endorsing Romney. The athletes are also donors to the Romney campaign.
  • American Action Network, a conservative nonprofit headed by former Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., aired “Gold,” an Olympic-themed ad that hits at “Illinois liberals” for their position on taxes.
  • The Texas Conservatives Fund, a super PAC backing Republican Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst, spent $325,000 on ads two days ahead of today’s GOP Senate runoff in Texas, with Dewhurst, the establishment favorite, facing off against former solicitor general and tea party favorite, Ted Cruz.
  • The pro-Ron Paul super PAC Endorse Liberty spent more than $80,000 on ads supporting Cruz, and Our Country Deserves Better, a super PAC affiliated with the Tea Party Express, spent an additional $5,000 supporting him.
  • Former Missouri State Treasurer Sarah Steelman, a Republican candidate for U.S. Senate in Missouri, got support from Our Country Deserves Better, which spent $12,000 on ads, and the Now or Never PAC, which spent $6,000 on ad production.
  • Prosperity for Michigan, a super PAC supporting Clark Durant in the GOP U.S. Senate primary in Michigan, reported spending $37,000 on TV ads in favor of Durant, the founder and former CEO of Cornerstone Schools, a group of charter and independent schools in inner-city Detroit.

Correction (July 31, 2012 at 1:30 p.m.): The Sierra Club’s 501(c)(4) organization paid for the wind industry ads, not Sierra Club Independent Action, the super PAC. This article has been updated to reflect this.

Read more in Federal Politics

Share this article

Join the conversation

Show Comments

11
Leave a Reply

avatar
9 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
1 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
SOUTH JERSEYTed SiroisMark SullivanTom LarkinAnonymous Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Mark Sullivan
Guest
Mark Sullivan

Trump needs to conduct these activities because the entire MSM media, excluding Fox, is campaigning against him 24/7/365.

Didn’t Monica’s boyfriend’s wife and various criminal enterprises outspend Trump by almost 2-1?

CapitalistRoader
Guest
CapitalistRoader

Why wouldn’t he get an early start on fund raising? Hillary outspent him two-to-one in 2016. The Dem’s are the party of big money. The President knows this and is attempting to get a jump on it. Of course the Dem candidate will outspend him in 2020 so it’s only rational that he starts fund raising now.

George Young
Guest
George Young

Oh brother. We just 8 years of the Campaigner – in – Chief. Where was this journalistic rectal thermometer then. Just another article about 2000 words too long that merely takes another slap at Trump for something he far from initiated.

j stevenson
Guest
j stevenson

The big difference between Trump and all the rest is his refusing to accept funds from lobbyists, so they don’t have the White House access they are used to. These are the donors who buy the presidency and are as pixxed off that he won the election as are the media and the Dems. Lobbyists have never been shut out of the WH and Trump has told them he is not for sale.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Trump needs to be impeached and tossed in prison. Then have the key thrown away so he will never be free. Then he can see how it feels not to have freedom.

Mark Sullivan
Guest
Mark Sullivan

Thank you for the usual insightful leftist low IQ Snowflake response.

barney
Guest

hes not imprisoning them hes sending them back to their country chill tf out

SOUTH JERSEY
Guest
SOUTH JERSEY

WHY DONT YOU HAVE FREEDOM?

Tom Larkin
Guest
Tom Larkin

First, something positive. I was happy to learn of empirical information in article. BUT, the article was so slanted against President Trump as to be deemed fake news (“Perhaps Trump just lied.” (Two different issues)). The article mentions that President Trump raised over $67 million, but ended 2018 with $19 million. President Trump spent over $40 million 2016 and 2017. President Trump conducted 57 political rallies. The article notes the hats and T-shirts sold, but NEVER MENTIONS THE INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF REPUBLICAN SENATORS during a mid-term election that lost the House and the number of political rallies in… Read more »

Ted Sirois
Guest
Ted Sirois

At least Trump is getting donations from willing donors. Fresh from his first election, Obama used billions of our children’s tax dollars to save thousands of union jobs in the car industry and bailed out the banks and many Wall Street businesses. This secured his source of reelection funds for his reelection four years later.

South Jersey
Guest
South Jersey

TRUMP 2020; IS AN AMAZINGLY SMART MAN! VERY ORIGINAL & CREATIVE. I AM HAPPY TO HAVE HIS AS POTUS.

SOUTH JERSEY
Guest
SOUTH JERSEY

THIS ARTICLE WAS OBVIOUSLY WRITTEN BY, A TRUMP-HATE-GROUP. THAT FEELS; IT IS NOT NORMAL TO BE SUCCESSFUL WITH YOUR OWN BRAND NAME. WHEN, IF FACT, IT IS NORMAL! >>>>> THIS IS >>> FAKE NEWS!!! <<<< ie: A PACK-OF-LIES; SPUN INTO; DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER. FOR A SINISTER-AGENDA OF; FASCIST DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST, COUP D'ETAT

David
Guest
David

Are you on some kind of drugs? Writing in caps makes me think that you are grumpy old fart or a uneducated hillbilly.