Federal Politics

Published — March 21, 2000 Updated — May 19, 2014 at 12:19 pm ET

$5,000 buys companies access to GOP attorneys general

Introduction

WASHINGTON, D.C. March 21, 2000 — For as little as $5,000, corporations are buying access to presidential candidate George W. Bush, along with key Bush strategist Karl Rove—not to mention potential protection from billions of dollars in lawsuits.

Five thousand dollars is the low end of the suggested $5,000-to-$25,000 price tag for joining the Republican Attorneys General Association. The group, which serves as a virtual slush-fund operation for the Republican National Committee, is financed by unlimited and undisclosed soft-money contributions from individuals, corporations and political action committees who join the organization created by the nations 12 elected Republican attorneys general.

At the very least, association with RAGA could give businesses advance word of costly state-prosecuted lawsuits, such as claims against the tobacco industry that cost the industry some $246 billion. At best, corporations that join RAGA secure potential allies in the White House and advocates in the offices of attorneys general who could discourage joining in such litigation.

An attorney general is a states chief legal officer, responsible for protecting the public interest, the public health and consumer’s rights. The big hurt imposed on tobacco companies was a direct result of states acting in concert to defend what they contended was the public interest.

It was the tobacco case that spawned the idea for RAGA. Two conservative attorneys general approached the Republican National Committee with a plan to fill its campaign coffers from the same deep pockets targeted by consumer protection groups.

The pitch: Donate to the RNC to ensure nonparticipation by Republican attorneys general in lawsuits against the corporations’ interests. “The Republican Attorneys General Association (RAGA) was born out of concerns arising out of the recent industry-wide lawsuits that seek to promote public policy changes via the courthouse rather than the statehouse,” says a fund-raising Jan. 19 letter from Republican Texas Attorney General John Cornyn, who is an executive committee member of RAGA.

Attorneys general are elected or appointed to “promote the public interest, not to protect the interests of big business,” said Mark Pryor, Arkansas attorney general and a Democrat. “RAGA is promising these big corporations that if you elect Republican attorneys general, you won’t get sued.”

RAGA insists in its material that the Republican attorneys general banded together for ideological reasons—“limited government, legal reform, personal responsibility, free enterprise, judicial restraint.”

However, the main objective of RAGA appears to be to put pro-business Republican attorneys general in every state house. Active campaigning for Republican candidates has already begun for the year-old group.

(The group’s first meeting, last year, attracted 70 people to South Carolina. The organization does not identify the 70.)

The association presses for funding from the very corporations that are at risk for high-dollar antitrust or consumer-protection lawsuits. A fund-raising letter to corporate givers from Cornyn, of Texas, said the following in describing the state lawsuit climate: “Some of the Attorneys General of other states in the wake of tobacco litigation, have created a wish list for future mass state lawsuits—car rental companies, pharmaceutical firms, makers of lead paint and gun manufacturers.”

Cornyn asserts that these are the corporations and industries being targeted by lawsuit-hungry Democratic attorneys general, but says that he and the other Republicans will counter their efforts.

Democratic Attorney General Mike Moore of Mississippi led the states charge against the tobacco industry. He told the Center that the attorneys general “only go against the wrongdoers and only those that break the law. We are not anti-big-business but anti-law breakers.

“It is clear that RAGA is courting the very corporations that currently or potentially face litigation over their consumer practices. Microsoft Corp. spokesman Rick Miller acknowledged to the Center that Microsoft is a member, donated $10,000, and plans to attend the associations March 30-31 conference at the Barton Creek Resort outside Austin, Texas.

Microsoft has antitrust litigation pending in 23 states.

“Microsoft’s contribution to RAGA is the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard,” said Moore of Mississippi. “With a case in 23 states, to align itself with this organization, there could easily be conflicts of interest here. RAGA will go solicit money from the corporate interests that some of their brothers and sisters have suits against. It isn’t the right thing for chief legal officers to be doing from a legal and ethical standpoint.”

RAGA has different membership levels for would-be donors. A $25,000 annual donation buys a “Roundtable” membership, which provides “preferred seating” at events, private RAGA conversations and a copy of the membership directory. A $15,000 gift earns a seat on the “committee,” which translates into tickets to events and entrée into RAGA conference calls. Memberships costing $10,000 and $5,000 afford less access. RAGA is quick to stipulate that there is “no statutory limit on the amount a corporation, individual, or PAC [political action committee] may contribute.”

Not only is there no limit, but no disclosure and no paper trail. RAGA has set itself up to be completely hidden from public view within the RNC. It works through the Republican National State Elections Committee, a soft-money fund of the RNC that transfers money to state parties, to the National Republican Governors Association and to RAGA. Donations are recorded as going to the RNC, but from there it is impossible to determine what goes into the RAGA fund or how RAGA spends the money.

RAGA is able to hide its contributors and expenditures because intra-party transfers are not reported to the Federal Election Commission. RAGA’s meetings are closed to the public and no membership or donor list is available to nonmembers.

Ben Dupuy, RAGA executive director, did not respond to the Center’s repeated requests for an interview.

The big draw at RAGA’s March 30-31 conference in Texas is Texas Gov. Bush, the Republican presidential candidate. For a minimum of $5,000, the donor gets access to the presidential candidate for two hours at a private reception at the Governors Mansion. The next morning, the group is to meet with Rove, presidential strategist and Bush’s friend of 25 years. Rove is to provide a “political briefing.” Both events offer corporate members a chance to raise complaints and put their legal concerns on a national group’s agenda.

[After our initial report, Scott McClellan, press officer for Bush, told the Center March 28 that Bush would be in Wisconsin on the opening day of the RAGA conference and not at the Governor’s Mansion. The Center had been told by two separate offices related to the governor that Bush was scheduled to attend the mansion reception. On March 30, the scheduling office at the Governor’s Mansion told the Center that the reception would not be held at the mansion.]

Lobbyists and corporate representatives from sweepstakes, alcohol, high-tech and lead-paint companies, along with gun manufacturers and tobacco interests will likely be present, according to Democratic attorneys general and a conclusion from the names of those whom RAGA appears to have targeted for participation.

Officers of the Republican Attorneys General Association

Charles Condon, chair, attorney general of South Carolina

Jane Brady, vice-chair, attorney general of Delaware

Bill Pryor, treasurer, attorney general of Alabama

Mark Earley, secretary, attorney general of Virginia

John Cornyn, executive committee member, attorney general of Texas

Read more in Federal Politics

Federal Politics

Bush’s insider connections preceded huge profit on stock deal

It has been widely reported that Texas Gov. George W. Bush made money over the years with a little help from his friends. But new details show that he served on an energy corporations board and was able to realize a huge profit by selling his stock in the corporation because an accounting sleight-of-hand concealed it was losing large sums of money. Shortly after he sold, the stock price plummeted. That profit helped make him a multimillionaire.

Share this article

Join the conversation

Show Comments

11
Leave a Reply

avatar
9 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
1 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
SOUTH JERSEYTed SiroisMark SullivanTom LarkinAnonymous Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Mark Sullivan
Guest
Mark Sullivan

Trump needs to conduct these activities because the entire MSM media, excluding Fox, is campaigning against him 24/7/365.

Didn’t Monica’s boyfriend’s wife and various criminal enterprises outspend Trump by almost 2-1?

CapitalistRoader
Guest
CapitalistRoader

Why wouldn’t he get an early start on fund raising? Hillary outspent him two-to-one in 2016. The Dem’s are the party of big money. The President knows this and is attempting to get a jump on it. Of course the Dem candidate will outspend him in 2020 so it’s only rational that he starts fund raising now.

George Young
Guest
George Young

Oh brother. We just 8 years of the Campaigner – in – Chief. Where was this journalistic rectal thermometer then. Just another article about 2000 words too long that merely takes another slap at Trump for something he far from initiated.

j stevenson
Guest
j stevenson

The big difference between Trump and all the rest is his refusing to accept funds from lobbyists, so they don’t have the White House access they are used to. These are the donors who buy the presidency and are as pixxed off that he won the election as are the media and the Dems. Lobbyists have never been shut out of the WH and Trump has told them he is not for sale.

jan v
Guest
jan v

all the lobbyists are running all our government agencies and all the career civil servants who know how to run the country have been fired. YOU think this is a good thing ? what a crock…

thomas alessi
Guest
thomas alessi

I am for Trump

Martin Shellabarger
Guest

J. Stevenson, what are you drinking? Trump has more lobbyists in his administration than probably any other president. Trump is totally “for sale”, and the corporations know it. Grow a brain!

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Trump needs to be impeached and tossed in prison. Then have the key thrown away so he will never be free. Then he can see how it feels not to have freedom.

Mark Sullivan
Guest
Mark Sullivan

Thank you for the usual insightful leftist low IQ Snowflake response.

barney
Guest

hes not imprisoning them hes sending them back to their country chill tf out

SOUTH JERSEY
Guest
SOUTH JERSEY

WHY DONT YOU HAVE FREEDOM?

Tom Larkin
Guest
Tom Larkin

First, something positive. I was happy to learn of empirical information in article. BUT, the article was so slanted against President Trump as to be deemed fake news (“Perhaps Trump just lied.” (Two different issues)). The article mentions that President Trump raised over $67 million, but ended 2018 with $19 million. President Trump spent over $40 million 2016 and 2017. President Trump conducted 57 political rallies. The article notes the hats and T-shirts sold, but NEVER MENTIONS THE INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF REPUBLICAN SENATORS during a mid-term election that lost the House and the number of political rallies in… Read more »

Ted Sirois
Guest
Ted Sirois

At least Trump is getting donations from willing donors. Fresh from his first election, Obama used billions of our children’s tax dollars to save thousands of union jobs in the car industry and bailed out the banks and many Wall Street businesses. This secured his source of reelection funds for his reelection four years later.

South Jersey
Guest
South Jersey

TRUMP 2020; IS AN AMAZINGLY SMART MAN! VERY ORIGINAL & CREATIVE. I AM HAPPY TO HAVE HIS AS POTUS.

SOUTH JERSEY
Guest
SOUTH JERSEY

THIS ARTICLE WAS OBVIOUSLY WRITTEN BY, A TRUMP-HATE-GROUP. THAT FEELS; IT IS NOT NORMAL TO BE SUCCESSFUL WITH YOUR OWN BRAND NAME. WHEN, IF FACT, IT IS NORMAL! >>>>> THIS IS >>> FAKE NEWS!!! <<<< ie: A PACK-OF-LIES; SPUN INTO; DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER. FOR A SINISTER-AGENDA OF; FASCIST DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST, COUP D'ETAT

David
Guest
David

Are you on some kind of drugs? Writing in caps makes me think that you are grumpy old fart or a uneducated hillbilly.