Business

Published — June 30, 2011 Updated — May 19, 2014 at 12:19 pm ET

SEC allows companies to bend the rules, with no follow-through

The Associated Press

Introduction

The Securities and Exchange Commission has a mechanism to allow financial companies “exemptions” from financial laws. But it allows those companies to essentially police themselves and a report by the SEC inspector general suggests those companies might not be doing a very good job.

From January 2008 through March 2010, the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations, or OCIE, launched 477 investigations into companies that had been granted exemptions. In some cases, a company had been issued a so-called exemptive order, allowing them to undertake an activity otherwise forbidden by SEC regulations. In others, it was a no-action letter, in which an SEC staffer indicated that a particular course-of-action that otherwise might run afoul of regulations wouldn’t yield any enforcement activity.

In one example cited in the report, a financial company asked for permission to distribute capital gains to its shareholders more frequently than permitted under law. A no-action letter cited in the report suggested that investment companies could lend their portfolio securities.

In these special cases, the exemption is contingent on the company adhering to strict conditions. But the report found that the SEC agencies setting those conditions don’t follow up to make sure that companies comply with those rules. Rather, investigations are carried out exclusively by the OCIE, with no formal sharing of information between other divisions and that office to indicate when exemptive orders or no-action letters have been issued.

The report looked at 72 of the 477 examinations flagged for the presence of an exemptive order or no-action letter, and found that companies had violated the conditions of the order or letter more than 60 percent of the time.

The report recommends that the three divisions of the SEC—Investment Management, Trading and Markets, and Corporation Finance—coordinate with the OCIE to track compliance with exemptive orders and no-action letters. The divisions track their issuance of the exemptions differently, and the report calls for them to develop a standardized tracking method.

Investment Management and Trading and Markets will be required to develop internal examination units under the Dodd-Frank act and the report calls on them to coordinate those efforts with the OCIE and use that staff to look at compliance with the orders and letters.

Finally, the report recommends that the divisions and OCIE consider the issuance of orders and letters as a risk factor in determining which companies to investigate.

While the SEC generally agreed with most of the findings, the Commission’s official response indicated that it believes companies that apply for orders or letters are less of a risk for breaking the law, because those companies are more “attuned to compliance issues.”

FAST FACT: One in 10 investigations undertaken by the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations between January 2008 and April 2010 involved a financial entity that had been granted an exemptive order or no-action letter.

Read more in Business

Share this article

Join the conversation

Show Comments

5
Leave a Reply

avatar
5 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
5 Comment authors
Bob FrankstonLinda GordonET69Jello Beyoncesam fetters Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
sam fetters
Guest
sam fetters

What do AT&T, Verizon and Crown Castle International Corp have in common? The largest institutional shareholders of each includes firms like: Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street (the “Big Three”), Invesco, Fidelity (FMR), JP Morgan, Wellington Management, Geode, T Rowe Price, Bank of America, and other of the largest money-management and investment firms, whom operate collaboratively (even comprising the largest shareholders of each other), forming virtual monopolies amongst the largest “competing” corporations, in most every single industry, via large share holdings. (source = http://investors.morningstar.com/ownership/shareholders-major.html?t=CCI) These are the same firms whom also largely own the third largest telecom, T-Mobile. The own the largest… Read more »

Jello Beyonce
Guest
Jello Beyonce

I’ve a theory that the supposed “Trade Wars” and “sanctions” and political/military strife going on between the U.S., China, Russia, etc. are merely distractions, serving to divert attention away from the growing authoritarianism and Oligarchic control spreading across the globe. “Nationalism” is being used as a propagandist covert means of continued increasing Globalism. As this article states: “A Russian woman stood up to speak at one of these public meetings, and she said that when she lived in Russia, the government slam dunked her and she had no say,” King said. “Now she lives in the United States of America,… Read more »

ET69
Guest
ET69

Marx was right about capitalism . Capital gets more and more concentrated in fewer and fewer hands. There is no way out of this greed. We need socialism!

Linda Gordon
Guest
Linda Gordon

5g is a kill grid. The depployment of this weapon is an act of terroism genocide and ecocide. The marketers need to be jailed as terrorists.

Bob Frankston
Guest

The real issue with 5G is that it’s an attempt to roll back the Internet and return to the telecom of the 1970s when the phone company controlled all.